Legal Opinion

Charles and Susan Glass v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 21, 2006No. 06-1398PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMUNDS, District Judge.

On 1992 and 1993 tax returns, Charles and Susan Glass (“Taxpayers”) claimed charitable deductions for two conservation easements. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the “Commissioner”) issued a notice of deficiency. Taxpayers filed a petition in the Tax Court challenging the Commissioner’s decision. The Commissioner conceded that the 1992 and 1993 contributions met two of the three requirements for a “qualified conservation contribution” under the Internal Revenue Code (“I.R.C.”), 26 U.S.C. § 170(h)(1); i.e., that the portions of the Glass property covered by each…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Glass v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2005
  2. Leonard Charles Ekman Kaye Layne Ekman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. Turner v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2006

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Whitehouse Hotel Ltd. Partnership v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  2. PBBM-Rose Hill, Ltd. v. Comm'r of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  3. Belk v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2013
  4. Samueli v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2009
  5. AmerGen Energy Co. ex rel. Exelon Generation Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API