Croker v. Goodnow
Supreme Court of Vermont
Book account. The auditor reported as follows : “ Upon hearing and examining the same, (referring to the accounts presented by the respective parties,) I allow the plaintiff’s account at the sum of forty-one dollars and ninety-one cents, and the defendant’s account at the sum of fourteen dollars. I find a balance of twenty-seven dollars and ninety-one cents due from tbe defendant to the plaintiff to balance book accounts between them.
Read the full summary
Book account. The auditor reported as follows : “ Upon hearing and examining the same, (referring to the accounts presented by the respective parties,) I allow the plaintiff’s account at the sum of forty-one dollars and ninety-one cents, and the defendant’s account at the sum of fourteen dollars. I find a balance of twenty-seven dollars and ninety-one cents due from tbe defendant to the plaintiff to balance book accounts between them. On this balance I allow the sum of one dollar and seventy-seven cents interest. I therefore find due from the defendant to the plaintiff, to balance their book…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Wilson, J.
The defendant, in the court below, excepted to the report of the auditor on two grounds: first, because the auditor did not state in his report any of the items of the plaintiff’s or defendant’s account which he allowed or disallowed ; and secondly, because the auditor, although requested, did not state in his report any facts in relation to the several items allowed in the *684plaintiff’s account or disallowed in the defendant’s account. We think the first exception was well taken, and that the report should have been recommitted. The statute…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boutwell v. Champlain Realty Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1915
- Sargeant v. PettiboneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1826
- Flower Brook Manufacturing Co. v. BuckSupreme Court of Vermont · 1844
- Macks v. BrushSupreme Court of Vermont · 1833