Legal Opinion

Keen v. Mirabile

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1965PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNicholas M. Pette, J.

Petitioner, by order to show cause, dated September 29, 1965, returnable October 4, 1965, moves for an order (CPLR, art. 78) directing respondent to bring on for trial the case of James Sherman Keen, plaintiff v. David *383Hilsen and D. Hilsen Corp., defendants, now pending before him and render such judgment as may be required by the law and facts of that action, and why petitioner should not have such other and further relief as may be just and proper in the premises.

It appears that the summons and complaint in said action were served on each of said defendants on February 13, 1965, returnable…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Allen v. MurrayThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1892
  2. People Ex Rel. Allen v. . MurrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Bianco v. AustinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  4. People ex rel. Elmira Advertiser Ass'n v. GormanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  5. General Steel Products Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Butts v. Justices of the Court of Special SessionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API