In Re the Appeals in Maricopa County Juvenile Actions No. JV119590 & No. JV118201
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1DissentKleinschmidt, Judge
I respectfully dissent because I think the majority does not give sufficient weight to the policy and purpose of Hinson v. Coulter, 150 Ariz. 306, 723 P.2d 655 (1986). That case was designed to put an end to a specific abuse. The state, overburdened, had fallen into the practice of violating Rule 8 trial deadlines in DUI cases by dismissing cases without prejudice and refiling them long after the defendant had originally been arrested or summoned to answer. Our supreme court said that if the state did not comply with Rule 8, DUI cases must be dismissed with prejudice. It specifically adopted…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. ZuckArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. WoratzeckArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Hinson v. CoulterArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. TuckerArizona Supreme Court · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.