Legal Opinion · Dissent

William John Simon v. Robert I. Moseley, Warden, U. S. Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 4, 1971No. 246-70Published

1DissentHill, Circuit Judge

I am compelled to respectfully dissent in this ease because I believe the conclusion reached by the majority is in conflict with prior decisions of this court concerning violators’ warrants.

The majority has correctly set forth the law applicable to the instant case; I dissent only as to the application of that law to the facts. It is firmly established that the issuance of a violator warrant triggers a process which, as a matter of fundamental fairness, must be pursued with reasonable diligence and dispatch. What constitutes a reasonable time is essentially a question of fact which will vary…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. John C. Jefferson v. J. T. Willingham, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  2. Arthur E. Small, Jr. v. United States Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  3. Charles Elmer Nash v. Robert I. Moseley, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  4. John Thomas Fitts v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API