Hamill Smith v. Ogden
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MONTEITH, Chief Justice.
This action was brought by appellees, Ralph Ogden and M. R. Reed, for the recovery of certain sums which were alleged to have been withheld from them by appellants, Claud B. Hamill and R. E. Smith, and Continental Oil Company, in the settlement of the affairs of jointly owned and operated oil leases.
Appellees pled four grounds of recovery: the sum of $9,237.55, alleged to be their ⅝ interest in a reduction in oil payments and overriding royalties made by the Pure Oil Company as a contribution to a settlement of a suit brought against appellants and the Pure Oil Company…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of San Antonio v. McKenzie Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
- Ablowich v. Greenville Natl. Bank.Texas Supreme Court · 1902
- Moore v. IveyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Chace v. GreggTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Moore v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1887
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- French v. FrenchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- Garza v. De MontalvoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948