Legal Opinion

Diggs v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 12, 1917PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Baltimore City. (Stump, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtStockbridcke, J.

The present, like the first appeal in this case (128 Md. 394), is from the rulings of the trial Court upon issues, sent from the Orphans-’ Court of Baltimore City, in regard to' the will of James Wakefield Cortland.

The issues, two in number, were whether or not the paper writing, purporting to> be the last will and testament of James Wakefield Cortland, and executed in February 11th, 1913, was procured by undue influence ; and second, whether the said paper was procured by the exercise of fraud practiced upon Mr. Cortland.

Without objection a verdict was rendered in favor of the will upon the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. DiggsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
  2. Park Land Corp. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
  3. Thomas v. DoubCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1851

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Loveday v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  2. Tu v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Black v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Malone v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  5. Mung Sen Tu v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API