Mosley v. Kelly
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
COLLIER, District Judge.
This case went to trial on two causes of action, one federal and one state. The first cause of action is the claim of Plaintiff Mary Mosley (“Mosley”) that Defendants Dr. Kirk Kelly (“Kelly”), Emily Chesnutt Baker (“Baker”), and the City of Chattanooga (all three defendants collectively will be referred to as (“Defendants”) violated 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by depriving her of her federally protected rights. The second cause of action is Mosley’s state law Tennessee Education Truth in Reporting and Employee Protection Act (hereinafter referred to as the “Education…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Board of Comm'rs, Wabaunsee Cty. v. UmbehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Carol L. Kirchner GAFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Owens v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hauck Manufacturing Co. v. Astec Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2005
- Cora B. Cantrell v. Knox County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- Lowery v. Jefferson County Board of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2007