Legal Opinion

State v. Kokomo Tube Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1981No. 2-780A234PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUCHANAN, Chief Judge.

CASE SUMMARY

Plaintiffs-appellants State of Indiana and IOSHA Inspector (the State) appeal from the trial court’s denial of their request for a warrant to inspect the workplace of defendant-appellee Kokomo Tube Company (the Company) pursuant to § 23.1 1 of the Indiana Occupational Safety and Health Act (IOSHA or Act), which gives IOSHA inspectors the authority to investigate business premises for violations of occupational safety and health standards, the State claiming that the trial court erred in concluding that issuance of a warrant to inspect under the statute…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United States v. BiswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Colonnade Catering Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Citimortgage, Inc. v. Shannon S. Barabas a/k/a Shannon Sheets Barabas, ReCasa Financial Group, LLC, and Rick A. SandersIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Heyde Companies v. Dove Healthcare, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Holmes v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Div.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. B & R Farm Services, Inc. v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Sullivan v. DayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API