Latter & Blum, Inc. v. Ditta
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Judge Rosemary Ledet
|! This is a consolidated concursus and damages action. This action arises out of an alleged breach of an agreement to purchase immovable property and resulting forfeiture of the deposit. Following a bench trial, the trial court rendered judgment in favor of the defendant-purchaser, Frank Scurlock, and against the plaintiff-seller, Teresa (“Terri”) Ditta, M.D., and her real estate agent, Latter & Blum, Inc. The trial court also awarded Mr. Scurlock the return of his $100,000 deposit, which the real estate agent had deposited into the registry of the court. For the reasons…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Hall v. Folger Coffee Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
- Cenac v. Public Access Water Rights Ass'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- Andrew Dev. Corp. v. West Esplanade Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
- Howard L. Makofsky, Jr. v. Raymond C. Cunningham, IICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- TMJ Grp. LLC v. IMCMV Holdings Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2018
- Baton Rouge Ventures, LLC v. Cedar Grove Capital, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2022
- Blanchard v. Gulf Coast Premium Seafoods, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021
- Donnie Pierre v. Kenneth W. Gardner and Candice B. GardnerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2021
- Harrier Enterprises, LLC v. Michael Imbornone; David A. Welch and the City of New Orleans, Department of Finance, Bureau of Treasury, Norman Foster, DirectorLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020