Legal Opinion

Latter & Blum, Inc. v. Ditta

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 22, 2017No. 2017-CA-0116, NO. 2017-CA-0117PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Rosemary Ledet

|! This is a consolidated concursus and damages action. This action arises out of an alleged breach of an agreement to purchase immovable property and resulting forfeiture of the deposit. Following a bench trial, the trial court rendered judgment in favor of the defendant-purchaser, Frank Scurlock, and against the plaintiff-seller, Teresa (“Terri”) Ditta, M.D., and her real estate agent, Latter & Blum, Inc. The trial court also awarded Mr. Scurlock the return of his $100,000 deposit, which the real estate agent had deposited into the registry of the court. For the reasons…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  2. Hall v. Folger Coffee Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  3. Cenac v. Public Access Water Rights Ass'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  4. Andrew Dev. Corp. v. West Esplanade Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  5. Howard L. Makofsky, Jr. v. Raymond C. Cunningham, IICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. TMJ Grp. LLC v. IMCMV Holdings Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2018
  2. Baton Rouge Ventures, LLC v. Cedar Grove Capital, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2022
  3. Blanchard v. Gulf Coast Premium Seafoods, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021
  4. Donnie Pierre v. Kenneth W. Gardner and Candice B. GardnerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. Harrier Enterprises, LLC v. Michael Imbornone; David A. Welch and the City of New Orleans, Department of Finance, Bureau of Treasury, Norman Foster, DirectorLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API