Legal Opinion

Manuta v. Lazarus

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided July 15, 1918PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Actiok to recover damages for personal injuries.

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

The plaintiff sued to recover damages for having fallen down the stairs of a tenement house. His right to recover was dependent upon whether the doors opening into the hall adjacent to the stairway contained glass panels in accordance with a provision of the Tenement House Law. Evidence was adduced on behalf of the plaintiff that the doors did not contain such panels, and evidence was adduced on behalf of the defendant that they did. There was also evidence to the effect that the structural conditions of the doors were the same on the day of the trial as on the day when the plaintiff met with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Springer v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Mitchell v. Rowley, New York County Courts1909

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. CASPER LODGE NO. 22 v. CorbridgeWyoming Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Tubular Products, Inc. v. JacobsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Tubular Products, Inc. v. JacobsonNew York Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API