Legal Opinion

In re Edourd S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 7, 2006PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In two related child protective proceedings pursuant to Fam*476ily Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from a fact-finding order of the Family Court, Kings County (Danoff, J.), dated March 23, 2005, which, after a hearing, found that she abused the child Maithsa Edourd S. and derivatively neglected the child Ernesto G.

Ordered that the fact-finding order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, a finding that a child is abused or neglected must be supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Ct Act § 1046…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re Tammie Z.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. In re Khadryah H.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. In re Rico D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. In re Frank F.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. In re Nicole G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re of Amber C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. In re Daniel R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. In Re Desiree P. Administration for Children's ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. In re Jelani B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Matter of Sarah C. (Caroline C.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API