Legal Opinion

State v. Yanez

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 3, 1985No. C8-85-590PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEDGWICK, Judge.

In this sentencing appeal, appellant challenges the use of three out-of-state convictions included in his criminal history score. We agree that one conviction should not have been included. We remand for resen-tencing.

FACTS

Appellant Richard Allen Yanez pleaded guilty to criminal sexual conduct in the fourth degree, Minn.Stat. § 609.345(c) (1984). He was sentenced to 42 months imprisonment based on a severity level VI offense and a criminal history score of 4. One point was assigned because he was on probation when he committed the offense and three points for felony…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. McAdooSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. State v. MarquettiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. YanezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. State v. EdmisonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API