Pugliese v. Hamburg

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Arber, J.), entered August 16, 1994, which denied petitioner chiropractor’s application pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondent’s determination that petitioner’s use of a Continental X-ray Corporation, model Hadley-325 X-ray system involves fluoroscopy in violation of Education Law § 6551 (2) (a), and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Whether the "videofluoroscope” or "visualizer” that petitioner seeks to use in his practice is a fluoroscope prohibited to chiropractors by the plain language of Education Law § 6551…