Legal Opinion · Dissent

Harvey's Estate

Pennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County

Decided January 22, 1943No. 3165 of 1940Published

1Dissent

Ladner, J.,

dissenting. — I dissent for the reasons set forth in my adjudication and for the following reasons not there discussed.

The apportionment statute of July 2, 1937, P. L. 2762, 20 PS §844, excepts from its operation cases “where a testator otherwise directs in his will”. The majority opinion concedes, as it must in view of our *20decision in Jeffery’s Estate, 32 D. & C. 5, affirmed in 333 Pa. 15, that this means “the testamentary direction” required by the statute to prevent apportionment may be implied. But the opinion adds: “Equivocal language, susceptible of more than one…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Beilstein v. BeilsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  2. Brown's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  3. Jeffery's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Newton's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Miller's TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API