Suquamish Tribe of Indians v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam: Asserting three general grounds of error, the Suquamish Tribe appeals from an award made to it by the Indian Claims Commission. The first contention is that the area in the State of Washington awarded to the Tribe under the doctrine of aboriginal ownership is too small. A very substantial part of this claim, as now made in this court, was not made before the Commission. We do not consider this post-award and post-appeal enlargement of the area claimed, on the established principle that these matters should have been presented to the factfinding tribunal; no adequate excuse is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Osage Nation of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
- Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Duwamish Tribes of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
- Seminole Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Iowa Tribe of the Iowa Reservation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- United States v. Oneida Nation of New YorkUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Seminole Nation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- United States v. Fort Sill Apache Tribe of OklahomaUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Seminole Nation of Oklahoma v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974