Legal Opinion

Vazquez v. Santisteban

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 25, 1976No. 75-1035PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEARSON, Judge.

The appellants Carlos M. Vazquez, Carmen Vazquez and Waldina Borrero are the record titleholders of real property. They were impleaded in proceedings supplementary to execution. See Fla.Stat. § 56.29. This appeal is from an order directing levy on the property for the judgment debt of Jorge Baro. The appellees are Gregorio Santisteban and Aida Santisteban, the judgment holders. The question presented is whether the record shows a fraudulent transfer of the title of the property from Jorge Baro to the Vazquezes and Borrero.

The record shows the history of the judgment and the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Waterman v. HigginsSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
  2. Winters v. ParksSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  3. Hunt, Et Ux. v. CovingtonSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  4. Stelle v. Dennis Et Vir.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
  5. Sample v. NatalbySupreme Court of Florida · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chase Federal Sav. and Loan Ass'n v. SchreiberSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. FLORIDA NAT. BANK & TRUST CO., ETC. v. HavrisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API