Looney v. Looney
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Pretermitting any decision upon the question as to whether or not, under the Code, § 113-611, in propounding for probate an alleged copy of a will claimed to have been lost or destroyed after the death of the testator, it is necessary not only to produce but to prove its execution by all three of the alleged subscribing witnesses who may be in life and available, or whether the same rule would apply as to the probate in solemn form of an existing will (see, in this connection as relating to a lost will, Kitchens v. Kitchens, 39 Ga. 168, 99 Am. D. 453; Mosely v. Carr, 70 Ga. 333; Scott v.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gillis v. GillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Scott v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Kitchens v. KitchensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1869
- Wood v. AcheySupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Hall v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Saliba v. SalibaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Westmoreland v. TallentSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- Murchison v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Murchison v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Saliba v. SalibaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947