Legal Opinion · Dissent

Parks v. Dittmar

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 14, 2010No. 09-3230, 09-3233, 09-3234, 09-3235, 09-3238, 09-3236, 09-3239, 09-3237Published

1DissentHolloway, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent. I would affirm the judgment of the bankruptcy court. The Debtors’ interests in the stock appreciation rights (SARs) were too uncertain to be included within their bankruptcy estates.

Background.

Almost all the relevant facts are noted in the majority opinion, and I will only mention facts that seem most critical to me. As noted in the majority opinion, the SARs at issue here were given for a fifteen year term (Maj. op. at 1203), while Spirit told the eligible employees, including Debtors, that it was “using a five-year period” in planning, which implied that Spirit…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Segal v. RochelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. In the Matter of Donald E. Sanders and Donna J. Sanders, Debtors. Appeal of Stephen R. Clark, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  3. Vogel v. Palmer (In Re Palmer)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · 1986
  4. Barowsky v. Serelson (In re Barowsky)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. Weinman v. Graves (In Re Graves)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API