Legal Opinion

Young v. Barker-Ransom

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 17, 1910PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by the defendants, Mary E. Leavitt and others, from an .order of the Supreme Court, made af the Westchester Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of tlie county of Westchester on the 4tli day of April, 1910.

1Opinion of the Court

Carr, J.:

This is an appeal from an order of a trial justice refusing- to resettle a case on appeal. The action was tried before the court without a jury, and pénding its determination the taking of an account was sent to a referee, whose report was confirmed before final judgment. The court having made its decision, judgment was *195entered thereon. The present appellants filed two sets of exceptions to the decision of the court, one set as to findings of fact made by the court on the ground that the findings were without any evidence to support them, and another set as to refusals by the court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Van Bokkelen v. . BerdellNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Uhlefelder v. City of Mount VernonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Savage v. PotterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API