Legal Opinion

Fluor Daniel, Inc. v. H.B. Zachry Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 22, 1999No. 13-98-021-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice CHAVEZ.

Appellant Fluor Daniel, Inc. (Fluor), brings this appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor of appellee, H.B. Zachry Company (Zachry). By two issues, Fluor contends the district court erred in granting the summary judgment based on grounds of res judicata and collateral es-toppel. We reverse.

Fluor and Zachry were named defendants in a lawsuit brought by Arturo Ruiz against several defendants.1 Ruiz was an employee of Citgo Petroleum Corporation (Citgo) when he fell from a scaffolding ladder and sustained serious injuries. Because Ruiz was covered by…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Science Spectrum, Inc. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Charles Brown, L.L.P. v. Lanier Worldwide, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  2. Continental Holdings, Ltd. v. Leahy, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2003
  3. Genecov Group, Inc. v. Roosth Production Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2004
  4. Charles Brown, L.L.P. D/B/A the Charles Brown Law Firm v. Lanier Worldwide, Inc., and Cam Edwards, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  5. Continental Holdings, Ltd. v. Jim Leahy, Individually Brown, Parker & Leahy, L.L.P. And Thompson & Knight, L.L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API