Rexroth Hydraudyne B v. v. Ocean World Lines, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WESLEY, Circuit Judge:
Two years ago this Court examined the interplay of two federal statutes that govern the transport of goods from foreign shores to inland delivery points in the United States. See Sompo Japan Ins. Co. of Am. v. Union Pac. R.R., 456 F.3d 54 (2d Cir.2006). We concluded that, when a rail carrier is charged with damage to the shipment, its liability is defined by the Car-mack Amendment 1 to the Interstate Commerce Act (“Carmack”), 49 U.S.C. § 11706, and that alternative contractual provisions of the accompanying intermodal bill of lading — even when authorized by the Carriage…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance, PLC v. Ocean World Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- In Re M/V Rickmers Genoa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance v. Evergreen Marine Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Regal-Beloit Corp. v. Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.