Bloomer v. State

[¶ 24] I join Chief Justice Voigt's dissent, but write separately because I disagree with the majority's resolution of the jury panel issue. The question presented is simple: Did the jury selection process comply with the Wyoming statutory requirements? To answer that question, I would interpret and apply the applicable Wyoming statutes. See State v. Curtis, 2002 WY 120, ¶¶ 23-26, 51 P.3d 867, 872 (Wyo.2002) (Golden, J., dissent*594ing). Because these statutes are clear and unambiguous, it is unnecessary to rely on constitutional principles or decisions from other jurisdictions with different…