Legal Opinion

Warren v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided April 16, 1951No. 573, Civil Action, 1950PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carey, J.:

It has frequently been held in Delaware that the violation of a rule of the road such as the ones here involved is negligence per se but that such negligence is not actionable, nor is it available under a plea of contributory negligence, unless it is a proximate cause of damage to another. Lynch v. Lynch, 9 W. W. Harr. 1, 195 A. 799. Ordinarily, whether such negligence is a proximate cause is a jury question but, like most such questions, it should he left to the jury only when there is 'a dispute of fact or when more than one reasonable inference may be drawn from the proven facts.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lindsay v. CecchiSupreme Court of Delaware · 1911
  2. Salvitti v. ThroppeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Lynch v. LynchSuperior Court of Delaware · 1937
  4. Brown v. SchendelmanSuperior Court of Delaware · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. James Hetherton and Carol Hetherton, His Wife v. Sears, Roebuck & Company, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  2. Davis v. Brooks Transportation CompanyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1960
  3. Wealth v. RenaiSuperior Court of Delaware · 1955
  4. Hetherton v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1978
  5. Deangelis v. U. S. A. C. Transport, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API