Jeckell v. Arkell
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE, Judge.
Appellant disputes numerous findings of the trial court in a partnership dissolution case where the court determined that appellant owes respondent over $14,000. Respondent also disputes some specific findings which he claims were clearly erroneous. We affirm.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
Plaintiff-appellant, Elmer Jeckell, and defendant-respondent, Raymond Arkell, Jr., are brothers-in-law. Both are farmers, and from 1969 until the fall of 1980 they exchanged labor, machinery, and goods in their separate farming operations. From 1976 through 1979 they also ran a cattle operation as a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Carpenter Ex Rel. Carpenter v. BirkholmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Noehl v. Midwest Empire, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974