Legal Opinion

Clem Lumber Co. v. Barnett

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 22, 1942No. 5889PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice.

In the findings of fact filed, the court found that at the time J. M. Barnett, defendant below, signed and delivered the note payable to Clem Lumber Company, plaintiff below, being the note sued upon, “There was no provision in the note as to any rate of interest; that after the note was signed and delivered, it was altered and changed by the insertion of the figure ‘8’ in the blank space where no rate of interest was provided;” and “that the note was materially altered and changed after insertion and delivery thereof, without the consent and knowledge of J. M. Barnett.” The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Cottle v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Republic National Bank of Dallas v. StrealyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  2. Wright v. McKinzieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API