Legal Opinion
Edge v. Alertox Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 20, 1933No. 22753PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. A notation printed in the margin of a subscription blank for the purchase of corporate stock furnished by the corporation that “the company is not responsible for statements or representations other than those contained in its printed literature,” is not part of the contract. Augusta Factory v. Mente, 132 Ga. 503 (64 S. E. 553); Menz Lumber Co. v. McNeeley, 58 Wash. 223 (108 Pac. 621, 28 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1007); Sturtevant Co. v. Fireproof Film Co., 216 N. Y. 199 (110 N. E. 440, L. R. A. 1916D, 1069). It is but notice of a self-imposed limitation upon the corporation’s liability in tort,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- R. J. Menz Lumber Co. v. E. J. McNeeley & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
- Elgin Jewelry Co. v. Estes & DozierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Barrie v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- B. F. Sturtevant Co. v. Fireproof Film Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Augusta Factory v. Mente & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Nalley & Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Cox v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935