Legal Opinion

Perciasepe v. National Reserve Insurance Co. of Illinois

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1929Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No question of joinder of actions is involved herein. There is but a single cause of action stated in the alternative with respect to one defendant or the other and the liability as between these defendants is determined by the decision of a common question of fact. (Ader v. Blau, 241 N. Y. 7, 13; Birch Field v. Davenport Shore Club, Inc., 223 App. Div. 767; Jamison v. Lamborn, 207 id. 375; Cuban-Canadian Sugar Co., S. A., v. Arbuckle, 127 Misc. 64; Carmody’s N. Y. Pr. [1924 Supp.] § 175, p. 57.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ader v. BlauNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Birch-Field v. Davenport Shore Club, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  3. Cuban-Canadian Sugar Co., S. A. v. ArbuckleNew York Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API