Legal Opinion
Hudson Valley Railway Co. v. Boston & Maine Railroad
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1904Published
Action for an injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
Kellogg, John M., J.
The plaintiff seeks an injunction requiring the defendant to receive cars and carload lots of freight and to deliver cars and carload lots of freight to the plaintiff at Stillwater and Saratoga, at which points there are physical connections of their respective roads. The connection at Stillwater was forced upon the defendant under section 12 of the Railroad Law by virtue of the decision In Matter of Stillwater & Mechanicsville Street R. Co. v. Boston & Maine R. R. Co., 171 N. Y. 589, the Stillwater company in that ease being one of the subsidiary companies of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. Denver & New Orleans RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- People Ex Rel. Treat v. . ColerNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- People ex rel. Murray v. LindenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Stillwater & Mechanicville Street Railway Co. v. Boston & Maine RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Stillwater & Mechanicville Street Railway Co. v. Boston & Maine RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902