Legal Opinion

Haumont v. Security State Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1985No. 83-955PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant, Security State Bank, from a judgment of the district court granting equitable rescission of a guaranty agreement, note, and mortgage executed by the plaintiffs, Lee P. and Letha Haumont. The errors assigned are generally three in nature: (1) The evidence was insufficient to support rescission on the ground of business duress; (2) The evidence failed to establish that proper notice of rescission had been given; and (3) The court erred in not requiring proof that the defendant was returned to its status quo. We affirm.

The plaintiffs’ action for rescission is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nixon v. HarkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Buhrman v. International Harvester CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Anson v. GraceNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Geise v. YarterNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Grasso v. DeanNebraska Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Kracl v. LosekeNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Lincoln Benefit Life Company, Nebraska Domestic Insurance Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Robert R. Edwards, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  3. Joseph D. Griggs v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
  4. Fritsch v. Hilton Land & Cattle Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Bock v. Bank of BellevueNebraska Supreme Court · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API