Legal Opinion

National Wall Paper Co. v. Gerlach

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided February 15, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal 'from order denying motion to punish the defendant for contempt. • '

1Opinion of the CourtMcCarthy, J.

An examination, of .the- testimony taken in these supplementary proceedings bears but one construction and leads but to one conclusion, that in transferring and pay-ing out the moneys testified to and in executing and-delivering the general assignment of his property by the defendant, after the service of - an order in supplementary proceedings-containing an injunction forbidding him from transferring or otherwise disposing of his property,, he- was ■ and is guilty of contempt, of court.

It was his voluntary. act, and the plaintiff, was injured hy the same, .since it had taken steps- by 'which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCorkle v. . HerrmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. People ex rel. Garbutt v. Rochester & State Line RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Moore v. DuffyNew York Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Ace Mail Advertising, Inc. v. NewgoldNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Norton v. Bielby, New York County Courts1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API