National Wall Paper Co. v. Gerlach
City of New York Municipal Court
Appeal 'from order denying motion to punish the defendant for contempt. • '
1Opinion of the CourtMcCarthy, J.
An examination, of .the- testimony taken in these supplementary proceedings bears but one construction and leads but to one conclusion, that in transferring and pay-ing out the moneys testified to and in executing and-delivering the general assignment of his property by the defendant, after the service of - an order in supplementary proceedings-containing an injunction forbidding him from transferring or otherwise disposing of his property,, he- was ■ and is guilty of contempt, of court.
It was his voluntary. act, and the plaintiff, was injured hy the same, .since it had taken steps- by 'which…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McCorkle v. . HerrmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- People ex rel. Garbutt v. Rochester & State Line RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Moore v. DuffyNew York Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1968
- Ace Mail Advertising, Inc. v. NewgoldNew York Supreme Court · 1933
- Norton v. Bielby, New York County Courts1914