Legal Opinion
Angus J. Depinto v. Hjalmar B. Landoe, Francis I. Sabo and Edwin B. Pegram
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 9, 1969No. 22343PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLEY, Circuit Judge:
This is a stockholder’s diversity derivative action. It was originally brought on behalf of United Security Life (United), an Arizona stock insurance corporation, by John S. Gorsuch, a stockholder of that company. Gorsuch sought to recover, for United, the value of assets of United which had been transferred on October 18, 1957, to American Security Investment Company (American). The suit was brought against Angus J. De-Pinto, Hjalmar B. Landoe, Francis I. Sabo, Edwin B. Pegram and several other personal and corporate defendants.
Following a trial, judgment was entered in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Depinto v. Provident Security Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Busy Bee Buffet, Inc. v. FerrellArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- Steinfeld v. NielsenArizona Supreme Court · 1913
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lathan v. BrinegarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Mardan Corp. v. C.G.C. Music, Ltd.District Court, D. Arizona · 1984
- Transcon Lines v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Pinal County v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. DeanDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.