McAlister v. Henkel
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brown
This case involves many of the questions already passed upon in the opinion in Hale v. Henkel, differing from that case, however, in two important particulars: First, in the fact that there was a complaint and charge made on behalf of the United States against the American Tobacco Company and the Imperial Tobacco Company under the so-called Sherman Act, and, second, that the subpoena pointed out the particular writings sought for (three agreements), giving, in each case the date, the names of the parties, and, in one instance, a suggestion of the contents.
The witness McAlister, who was…
2Cited by40 opinions
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Harold JudsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Royal G. Bouschor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
- State v. MyersArizona Supreme Court · 1977
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.