Cummings v. State

BLACKBURN, Presiding Judge.

Following his conviction for aggravated assault 1 and the denial, nearly six years after its filing of his motion for new trial, Reginald Cummings appeals, arguing that (1) the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, and that the trial court erred in: (2) admitting his statement into evidence; (3) denying his motion in limine; (4) denying his motion for mistrial; and (5) charging the jury on conspiracy. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

We note that it took far too long for the trial court to consider Cummings’s motion for new trial. Cummings’s…