Legal Opinion
Jorge Anderson Lomas-Naranjo v. Jeff Tindall, et al.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided August 18, 2026No. 3:26-cv-00523Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION JORGE ANDERSON LOMAS-NARANJO, Petitioner, v. Civil Action No. 3:26-cv-523-RGJ JEFF TINDALL, et al., Respondents. * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Jorge Anderon Lomas-Naranjo’s Amended Writ of Habeas Corpus. [DE 5]. Respondents responded on July 24, 2026. [DE 8]. The parties agree no evidentiary hearing is necessary. [DE 9; DE 11]. This matter is ripe for adjudication. For the reasons below, the Court DENIES the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. [DE 5]. I.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Demore v. KimSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Nielsen v. PreapSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- GUERRABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.