Legal Opinion

Witte v. Witte

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 4, 2012No. 4D11-3520PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Carol M. Witte (the wife), the petitioner in a dissolution of marriage proceeding pending below, seeks certiorari review of a non-final order in which the trial court determined that she had waived the attorney-client privilege as to communications with her attorney by having an estimated sixty to sixty-five percent of her communications with counsel in the presence of her daughter, and some in the presence of her son-in-law. We grant the petition.

While being deposed by the husband, Robert D. Witte, the wife and her attorney refused to answer certain questions, including questions as to how…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stroh v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Gerheiser v. StephensDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  3. California Oak Foundation v. County of TehamaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Las Olas River House Condominium Ass'n v. Lorh, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. Kleiman v. WrightDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
  3. Las Olas River House Condominium Association, Inc., The Continental Group, Inc. John Quaintance, Jerome Schechter and Arminda Figueroa v. Lorh, LLC, Sandy Robert Levy, CPA, PL, d/b/a Choice Realty and Sandy Robert LevyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API