Stirling v. Sapp

HOBSON, Judge.

Appellants, plaintiffs below, bring this appeal from a final order which set aside a judgment entered on a verdict in their favor and which entered final judgment in favor of appellees.

Appellants contend that the trial court’s action in setting aside the jury verdict was erroneous for the reasons that (1) appel-lees did not renew their motion for directed verdict at the close of all the evidence and (2) there was sufficient evidence to support the verdict itself. However, the record shows that appellants’ first contention is unfounded in fact.

In regard to appellants’ second…