Legal Opinion
McKay v. Thompson
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 18, 2000No. 99-6598PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Martin S. McKay brought suit in district court against two Tennessee state election officials and two Hamilton county election officials, in their official and individual capacities.1 McKay wishes to stop Tennessee from continuing its practice of requiring its citizens to disclose their social security numbers as a precondition to voter registration. The district court granted summary judgment for defendants. McKay now appeals. Upon de novo review, we affirm for the reasons stated below.
I
A. Statutory Construction of the Tennessee Statute
We…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Regina McCormick v. Miami UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Jesus Gonzalez v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Doe v. Ohio State UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016
- Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless v. HustedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Schwier v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.