McCormack v. Lindberg
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
This appeal arises from a medical malpractice action brought against Dr. Lind-berg, a thoracic cardiovascular surgeon, by the patient and his wife. The jury returned a special verdict finding that Dr. Lindberg had not been negligent. After the trial court denied plaintiffs’ motions for judgment n.o.v. or for a new trial, judgment was entered. Plaintiffs appeal. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
William McCormack suffered from a condition known as “thoracic outlet syndrome,” which is caused by compression of vessels and nerves in the thoracic (chest) region and results in pain…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Christy v. SalitermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Cornfeldt v. TongenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Swanson Ex Rel. Swanson v. ChattertonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Pearce v. LindeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Mockler v. City of StillwaterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hall v. HilbunMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. PooleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Velazquez Ex Rel. Velazquez v. PortadinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- Aikman v. KandaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Gysegem v. Ohio State Univ. Wexner Med. Ctr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.