Legal Opinion

McCormack v. Lindberg

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 12, 1984No. C5-83-1448PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

This appeal arises from a medical malpractice action brought against Dr. Lind-berg, a thoracic cardiovascular surgeon, by the patient and his wife. The jury returned a special verdict finding that Dr. Lindberg had not been negligent. After the trial court denied plaintiffs’ motions for judgment n.o.v. or for a new trial, judgment was entered. Plaintiffs appeal. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

William McCormack suffered from a condition known as “thoracic outlet syndrome,” which is caused by compression of vessels and nerves in the thoracic (chest) region and results in pain…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Christy v. SalitermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  2. Cornfeldt v. TongenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Swanson Ex Rel. Swanson v. ChattertonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  4. Pearce v. LindeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Mockler v. City of StillwaterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hall v. HilbunMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. PooleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Velazquez Ex Rel. Velazquez v. PortadinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  4. Aikman v. KandaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Gysegem v. Ohio State Univ. Wexner Med. Ctr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API