Worley v. City of Asheville
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Chief Judge.
Petitioner’s sole argument on appeal is that the trial court erred by granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment. He claims the evidence before the trial court in the hearing on respondent’s summary judgment motion raises a genuine issue as to whether he was entitled to a salary increase of 7.5%. We disagree.
Chapter 757 of the 1953 Session Laws, as amended in Chapter 415 of the 1977 Session Laws, provides as follows:
Whenever any member of the classified service of the City of Asheville is discharged, suspended, reduced in rank, transferred against his or her will,…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Harper v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- City of Asheville v. BowmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005