Legal Opinion

Worley v. City of Asheville

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 6, 1990No. 9028SC320PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

Petitioner’s sole argument on appeal is that the trial court erred by granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment. He claims the evidence before the trial court in the hearing on respondent’s summary judgment motion raises a genuine issue as to whether he was entitled to a salary increase of 7.5%. We disagree.

Chapter 757 of the 1953 Session Laws, as amended in Chapter 415 of the 1977 Session Laws, provides as follows:

Whenever any member of the classified service of the City of Asheville is discharged, suspended, reduced in rank, transferred against his or her will,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harper v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. City of Asheville v. BowmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API