Legal Opinion

State v. Bates

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1941No. 6919PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

— On his appeal from conviction of the grand larceny of an automobile and being a persistent violator appellant assigns two errors. The first one is that prior to the present prosecution he had been convicted of a felony three times, this would therefore be his fourth conviction, and he could not be a persistent violator because section 19-2414 I. C. A. provides that upon conviction for the third time of the commission of a felony one shall be considered a persistent violator. Obviously the legislature never intended by such statute that one would be a persistent violator upon the conviction…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. SullivanIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  2. State v. VanekIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  3. State v. SeymourIdaho Supreme Court · 1900
  4. State v. SanfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1902
  5. State v. BogrisIdaho Supreme Court · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  2. State v. GilbertIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
  3. State v. HuskinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  4. State v. SnyderIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  5. State v. EdwardsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API