State v. Bates
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.
— On his appeal from conviction of the grand larceny of an automobile and being a persistent violator appellant assigns two errors. The first one is that prior to the present prosecution he had been convicted of a felony three times, this would therefore be his fourth conviction, and he could not be a persistent violator because section 19-2414 I. C. A. provides that upon conviction for the third time of the commission of a felony one shall be considered a persistent violator. Obviously the legislature never intended by such statute that one would be a persistent violator upon the conviction…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. SullivanIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. VanekIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
- State v. SeymourIdaho Supreme Court · 1900
- State v. SanfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1902
- State v. BogrisIdaho Supreme Court · 1914
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- State v. GilbertIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
- State v. HuskinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. SnyderIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. EdwardsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.