Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Willing v. Mazzocone

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1978No. 320Published

1ConcurrenceRoberts, Justice

I agree with the opinion of Mr. Justice Manderino that appellant’s indigency does not justify the Superior Court’s radical departure from the long-standing general rule that equity will not enjoin a defamation. In Heilman v. Union Canal Company, 37 Pa. 100, 104 (1860), this Court said:

“The fact, if it be so, that this remedy may not be successful in realizing the fruits of a recovery at law, on account of the insolvency of the defendants, is not of itself a ground of equitable interference. The remedy is what is to be looked at. If it exist [sic], and is ordinarily adequate, its possible want…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. New York Times Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Organization for a Better Austin v. KeefeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Reitman v. MulkeySupreme Court of the United States · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API