Legal Opinion

Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. Burgess

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 28, 1943PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaRNHill, J.

There are no exceptions to tbe facts found by tbe court below and there is no real controversy in respe.ct thereto. Tbe plaintiff only challenges tbe correctness of tbe legal conclusion drawn therefrom.

While tbe court below found tbat all of tbe materials which were delivered to tbe projects by tbe plaintiff were actually incorporated in tbe projects tbis fact was denied by tbe surety. Upon tbat ground it disclaimed any liability therefor. Tbe result of tbis dispute was tbe release agreement wbicb controls tbe merits of-tbis controversy.

Hence, tbe question posed for decision is tbis: Did tbe…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Davis v. FrazierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  2. Davis v. . FrazierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  3. Wooten v. . HobbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Gilbert v. Waccamaw Shingle Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. Bowden v. . LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. J. T. Hobby & Son, Inc. v. Family Homes of Wake County, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Weyerhaeuser Company v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Callaham v. ArensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Stanley v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Bolton Corp. v. T. A. Loving Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API