Legal Opinion

Hugoe v. Woods Cross City

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided October 7, 1999No. 981502-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BENCH, Judge:

¶ 1 Appellant Woods Cross City (the city) asserts that the trial court erred in determining that appellees’ use of their property for parking, staging, and storing trucks used in their business is a valid nonconforming use. The city also argues that the trial court erred in applying the doctrine of zoning estoppel and determining that the city was estopped from enforcing its current zoning regulations against appellees. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶2 Appellees Damon and Debbie Hugoe own and operate Hugoe Trucking, Inc., which engages in interstate transport and local hauling of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Walker v. U.S. General, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Armco Steel v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  3. Gibbons & Reed Company v. North Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Town of Alta v. Ben Hame Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Triangle Fraternity v. City of Norman, Ex Rel. Norman Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  2. Vial v. Provo CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009
  3. Triangle Fraternity v. City of Norman, Ex Rel. Norman Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  4. Vial v. Provo CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API