Legal Opinion

Smith v. Drew

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1933No. 24507. Department OnePublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steinert, J.—

Plaintiff sought to recover damages upon two causes of action, one for an assault and the other for false arrest and imprisonment following the assault. Separate answers were filed by the defendants. Upon a trial by jury, a verdict was rendered in favor of plaintiff as to the defendant Ebley on the cause of action for assault; in all other respects, the verdict was in favor of all of the defendants. A motion for new trial having been overruled, judgment was entered upon the verdict, from which plaintiff has appealed.

The facts which respondents’ evidence tended to establish may be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coles v. McNamaraWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Larson v. EricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Miles v. FletcherWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Reynolds v. DicksonWashington Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. BridgemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  2. Bond v. Wabash Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  3. State v. GrenzWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Holcomb v. Walter's Dimmick Petroleum, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2006
  5. McCord v. TielschCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API