Harrison v. State

GOSHORN, Judge.

Darrell Harrison appeals1 the judgment and sentence imposed, arguing that the trial court should have granted his motion to dismiss Count I because the State charged him with violating the penalty provision of a statute, rather than charging him with the substantive criminal act of corruption by threat against a public servant.2 Additionally, Harrison asserts that the ehargé in Count II, battery, is factually and legally subsumed within Count I, and thus convicting him of both counts violates double jeopardy. The State responds that the trial court correctly denied Harrison’s…