Legal Opinion

Bashinski Jr. v. United States

District Court, S.D. California

Decided January 22, 2024No. 3:23-cv-01026Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 MARTIN MACK BASHINSKI JR., Case No.: 23-cv-01026-JO-JLB 13 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 14 v. MOTION TO COMPEL MEDICAL RECORDS RELEASE 15 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 16 Defendant. [ECF Nos. 24; 26] 17 18 Before the Court is a Motion to Compel filed by Defendant United States of America 19 (“Defendant”). (ECF No. 24.) Pro se plaintiff Martin Mack Bashinski, Jr. (“Plaintiff”) 20 filed an opposition.1 (ECF No. 26.) For the reasons set forth herein, the Court GRANTS 21 Defendant’s motion as modified…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Soto v. City of ConcordDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
  3. Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. District of Columbia v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API