Legal Opinion

Meadows v. Costoff

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 1, 1952No. 4-9843PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.

Appellee has filed motion to strike the bill of exceptions, as filed too late. We now deny the motion; but, because of the question presented, we are delivering this written opinion. We hold that it is unnecessary for a chancery decree to fix the time for filing the bill of exceptions since Act 139 of 1951 fixes such time.1

' I. Date of Decree. Mrs. Meadows sued Costoff in the Northern District of the Logan Chancery Court. The testimony was taken ore tenus on May 24 and May 29, 1951; and the cause taken under advisement. On October 1, .1951, the Chancellor informed the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McGraw v. BerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  2. Red Bud Realty Co. v. SouthSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  3. Johnson v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  4. Floyd v. RichmondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  5. Bolls v. CraigSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Parker v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  2. Blackburn v. FordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  3. Townson v. TownsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  4. Cantrell v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API