Meadows v. Costoff
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.
Appellee has filed motion to strike the bill of exceptions, as filed too late. We now deny the motion; but, because of the question presented, we are delivering this written opinion. We hold that it is unnecessary for a chancery decree to fix the time for filing the bill of exceptions since Act 139 of 1951 fixes such time.1
' I. Date of Decree. Mrs. Meadows sued Costoff in the Northern District of the Logan Chancery Court. The testimony was taken ore tenus on May 24 and May 29, 1951; and the cause taken under advisement. On October 1, .1951, the Chancellor informed the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McGraw v. BerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Red Bud Realty Co. v. SouthSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- Johnson v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- Floyd v. RichmondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- Bolls v. CraigSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Parker v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
- Blackburn v. FordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
- Townson v. TownsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
- Cantrell v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953