Legal Opinion

Burchfield v. Saul

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided March 27, 2025No. 4:21-cv-01755Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT March 27, 2025 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk HOUSTON DIVISION § Ricky B., § § Plaintiff, § § Civil Action No. 4:21-cv-01755 v. § § Andrew Saul, et al., § § Defendants. § § MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION On February 13, 2025, counsel for Plaintiff Ricky B. filed a motion requesting attorneys’ fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), pursuant to a contingency fee agreement, based on Plaintiff’s recovery of disability benefits from the Social Security Administration after the case was remanded by this Court. See Dkt. 30 (motion for fees); Dkt. 28 (Court’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alfred Ortiz, III v. City of San Antonio Fire DeptCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  2. Pierce v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  3. Rice v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API