Harrison v. Harrison

OPINION

REID, Justice.

This divorce case presents for review the judgment of the Court of Appeals, affirming the trial court, that a one-half undivided interest in a tract of real property is marital property within the meaning of Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-4-121(b)(1)(B) (1991). This Court finds that the interest is the husband’s separate property, not marital property, thus requiring that the Court of Appeals’ decision be reversed.

The parties were married in 1957. Both parties reside in Rutherford County, where the subject property is located. The husband, James Nesbitt Harrison, is a long-time…